Monday, July 20, 2009
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Friday, March 13, 2009
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Egypt: Mystery of the temple of Seti
Take a look at the following photographs…
What did you see? An helicopter? An airplane? Some strange vehicle?

- If yes: you will be thinking about Photoshop (as I did), but no, these hieroglyphs are really carved on stone. The explanations for this (the skeptical explanations we must say…) are that these figures came as the result of modern creative people, or that the hieroglyphs were made above old ones and with the passing of time these figures were created (…an amazing coincidence! we must say). Well, simply nobody knows, because no one has published yet, a convincing explanation for it.
- If no: you have no imagination

Monday, August 25, 2008
Monkeys buy SEX
Economic researchers at Yale managed to successfully train Capuchin monkeys to understand and use currency. The result? The monkeys used their newfound currency to buy sex.
...Perhaps the most distinguishing characteristic of money, after all, is its fungibility, the fact that it can be used to buy not just food but anything. During the chaos in the monkey cage, Chen saw something out of the corner of his eye that he would later try to play down but in his heart of hearts he knew to be true. What he witnessed was probably the first observed exchange of money for sex in the history of monkeykind. (Further proof that the monkeys truly understood money: the monkey who was paid for sex immediately traded the token in for a grape.)
This is a sensitive subject. The capuchin lab at Yale has been built and maintained to make the monkeys as comfortable as possible, and especially to allow them to carry on in a natural state. The introduction of money was tricky enough; it wouldn't reflect well on anyone involved if the money turned the lab into a brothel. To this end, Chen has taken steps to ensure that future monkey sex at Yale occurs as nature intended it.
But these facts remain: When taught to use money, a group of capuchin monkeys responded quite rationally to simple incentives; responded irrationally to risky gambles; failed to save; stole when they could; used money for food and, on occasion, sex. In other words, they behaved a good bit like the creature that most of Chen's more traditional colleagues study: Homo sapiens.
Source: nytimes.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)